The current clinical practice for management of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture: a European survey.

Aims: Many historical and recent reports showed that post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a life-threatening condition and the strategy to optimally manage it remains undefined. Therefore, disparate treatment policies among different centres with variable results are often described. We analysed data from European centres to capture the current clinical practice in VSR management. Methods and results: Thirty-nine centres belonging to eight European countries participated in a survey, filling a digital form of 38 questions from April to October 2022, to collect information about all the aspects of VSR treatment. Most centres encounter 1-5 VSR cases/year. Surgery remains the treatment of choice over percutaneous closure (71.8% vs. 28.2%). A delayed repair represents the preferred approach (87.2%). Haemodynamic conditions influence the management in almost all centres, although some try to achieve patients stabilization and delayed surgery even in cardiogenic shock. Although 33.3% of centres do not perform coronarography in unstable patients, revascularization approaches are widely variable. Most centres adopt mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mostly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially pre-operatively to stabilize patients and achieve delayed repair. Post-operatively, such MCS are more often adopted in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Conclusion: In real-life, delayed surgery, regardless of the haemodynamic conditions, is the preferred strategy for VSR management in Europe. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming the most frequently adopted MCS as bridge-to-operation. This survey provides a useful background to develop dedicated, prospective studies to strengthen the current evidence on VSR treatment and to help improving its currently unsatisfactory outcomes.

Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery for 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary disease not involving the left main have shown significantly lower rates of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke after CABG. These studies did not routinely use current-generation drug-eluting stents or fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide PCI. METHODS: FAME 3 (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, international, randomized trial involving patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease (not involving the left main coronary artery) in 48 centers worldwide. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FFR-guided PCI using zotarolimus drug-eluting stents or CABG. The prespecified key secondary end point of the trial reported here is the 3-year incidence of the composite of death, MI, or stroke. RESULTS: A total of 1500 patients were randomized to FFR-guided PCI or CABG. Follow-up was achieved in >96% of patients in both groups. There was no difference in the incidence of the composite of death, MI, or stroke after FFR-guided PCI compared with CABG (12.0% versus 9.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.3 [95% CI, 0.98-1.83]; P=0.07). The rates of death (4.1% versus 3.9%; HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6-1.7]; P=0.88) and stroke (1.6% versus 2.0%; HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.4-1.7]; P=0.56) were not different. MI occurred more frequently after PCI (7.0% versus 4.2%; HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.7]; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of the composite of death, MI, or stroke after FFR-guided PCI with current-generation drug-eluting stents compared with CABG. There was a higher incidence of MI after PCI compared with CABG, with no difference in death or stroke. These results provide contemporary data to allow improved shared decision-making between physicians and patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02100722.

Safety and Hemostatic Effectiveness of SURGICEL® Powder in Mild and Moderate Intraoperative Bleeding.

This postmarket clinical study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the novel adjunctive topical hemostat SURGICEL® Powder (SURGICEL®-P), a powdered form of oxidized regenerated cellulose. In a prospective, open-label, single-arm multicenter trial, adult surgical subjects with mild-to-moderate bleeding for which conventional hemostatic methods were impractical/ineffective were treated with SURGICEL®-P. Descriptive analyses included hemostatic success rate at 3, 5, and 10 min, rebleeding and thromboembolic events, SURGICEL®-P-related serious adverse events requiring surgical intervention, and SURGICEL®-P ease of use (questionnaire). In 8 centers, 103 subjects were enrolled with a median (range) age of 64.0 (33.0-88.0) years. Surgeries were open (53.4%) or laparoscopic/thoracoscopic (46.6%) and mostly urological (37.9%) and abdominal (32.0%) procedures. Bleeding sites included various tissue types, with a median (range) surface area of 4 (0.02-72.0) cm2. Hemostatic success rates were 77.7%, 87.4%, and 92.2% at 3, 5, and 10 min, respectively. In 7 subjects (6.8%), investigators reverted to standard of care. No safety signals were identified. Two deaths occurred with causes unrelated to SURGICEL®-P. Investigators favorably evaluated the ease of use of the SURGICEL®-P device. SURGICEL®-P is safe and effective in controlling mild-to-moderate bleeding in a broad range of surgical procedures. The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03762200.

Treatment of Anomalous Coronary Arteries-Surgical Revascularisation Using the Pure Internal Thoracic Artery Technique.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of CABG utilising an isolated pedicled Right Internal Thoracic Artery (RITA) or Left Internal Thoracic Artery (LITA) or the Pure Internal Thoracic Artery (PITA) technique to treat anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery (AAOCA). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients at our institution over an 8-year period (2013-2021) who underwent surgery for AAOCA was performed. Data assessed included patient demographics, initial presentation, morphology of coronary anomaly, surgical procedure, cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and long-term outcome. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients underwent surgery, including 11 males (78.5%) with a median logistic EuroSCORE of 1.605 (IQR 1.34). The median age was 62.5 years (IQR 48.75). Presentation was angina (7 patients), acute coronary syndrome (5 patients), incidental findings in aortic valve pathology (2 patients). AAOCA morphology varied: RCA from left coronary sinus (6), RCA from left main stem (3), left coronary artery from the right coronary sinus (1), left main stem arising from right coronary sinus (2) and circumflex artery arising from the right coronary sinus (2). Overall, 7 patients had co-existing flow-limiting coronary artery disease. CABG was performed using either a pedicled skeletonized RITA, LITA or PITA technique. There was no perioperative mortality. Overall median follow-up time was 43 months. One patient presented with recurrent angina secondary to graft failure at 2 years and there were two non-cardiac-related deaths at 4 and 35 months. CONCLUSION: The use of internal thoracic artery grafts can provide a durable treatment option in patients with anomalous coronary arteries. The potential risk of graft failure in patients with no flow-limiting disease should be very carefully considered. However, a proposed benefit of this technique is the use of a pedicle flow to increase the long-term patency. More consistent results are obtained when ischaemia can be demonstrated preoperatively.

Multidisciplinary paper on patient blood management in cardiothoracic surgery in the UK: perspectives on practice during COVID-19.

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted all surgical specialties significantly and exerted additional pressures on the overburdened United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service. Healthcare professionals in the UK have had to adapt their practice. In particular, surgeons have faced organisational and technical challenges treating patients who carried higher risks, were more urgent and could not wait for prehabilitation or optimisation before their intervention. Furthermore, there were implications for blood transfusion with uncertain patterns of demand, reductions in donations and loss of crucial staff because of sickness and public health restrictions. Previous guidelines have attempted to address the control of bleeding and its consequences after cardiothoracic surgery, but there have been no targeted recommendations in light of the recent COVID-19 challenges. In this context, and with a focus on the perioperative period, an expert multidisciplinary Task Force reviewed the impact of bleeding in cardiothoracic surgery, explored different aspects of patient blood management with a focus on the use of haemostats as adjuncts to conventional surgical techniques and proposed best practice recommendations in the UK.

Redo aortic valve replacement versus valve-in-valve trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: a UK propensity-matched analysis.

This study sought to compare the morbidity and mortality of redo aortic valve replacement (redo-AVR) versus valve-in-valve trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (valve-in-valve TAVI) for patients with a failing bioprosthetic valve. A multicenter UK retrospective study of redo-AVR or valve-in-valve TAVI for patients referred for redo aortic valve intervention due to a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis. Propensity score matching was performed for confounding factors. From July 2005 to April 2021, 911 patients underwent redo-AVR and 411 patients underwent valve-in-valve TAVI. There were 125 pairs for analysis after propensity score matching. The mean age was 75.2±8.5 years. In-hospital mortality was 7.2% (n=9) for redo-AVR versus 0 for valve-in-valve TAVI, p=0.002. Surgical patients suffered more post-operative complications, including intra-aortic balloon pump support (p=0.02), early re-operation (p<0.001), arrhythmias (p<0.001), respiratory and neurological complications (p=0.02 and p=0.03) and multi-organ failure (p=0.01). The valve-in-valve TAVI group had a shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay (p<0.001 for both). However, moderate aortic regurgitation at discharge and higher post-procedural gradients were more common after valve-in-valve TAVI (p<0.001 for both). Survival probabilities in patients who were successfully discharged from the hospital were similar after valve-in-valve TAVI and redo-AVR over the 6-year follow-up (log-rank p=0.26). In elderly patients with a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis, valve-in-valve TAVI provides better early outcomes as opposed to redo-AVR, although there was no difference in mid-term survival in patients successfully discharged from the hospital.

Andexanet alfa in acute aortic syndrome: first UK experience.

Andexanet alfa was employed to reverse the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants in 3 patients who required emergent surgery for repair of type A aortic dissection. Its use was instrumental in securing haemostasis. However, we caution against the administration of Andexanet alfa prior to cardiopulmonary bypass as it can induce heparin resistance and complicate the perioperative monitoring of anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass.

The Glasgow Experience of Extended Myocardial Protection: A Novel Method of Implantation to Reduce Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Around 2000 heart transplants are performed in Europe annually. The rates of primary graft dysfunction in Europe are among the highest in the world. With increasing demand for organs and the limited supply of donors, novel techniques such as ex vivo normothermic perfusion have garnered incre-asing interest. We present a series of patients who underwent heart transplant at our unit in which we used a novel implantation technique to reduce primary graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared our experience with the novel method detailed in our article (Glasgow experience group) with a contemporary UK cohort (2015-2016) of patients (control group). We performed multivariable logistic regression to compare the Glasgow experience with the control group with primary graft dysfunction as the outcome measure. We adjusted for donor age, recipient diabetes mellitus, urgent listing status, bypass time, and total ischemic time. RESULTS: Among 194 patients in both cohorts, 140 patients (72.1%) were men and 36 (18.6%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The odds ratio of primary graft dysfunction in the control group was 2.99 (95% CI, 1.02- 8.75) compared with the Glasgow experience group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel approach was associated with significant reductions in primary graft dysfunction, with a trend toward improved 1-year survival. Larger studies are needed to show differences after further adjustment for known confounders of primary graft dysfunction. We believe this novel technique is safe, cost-effective, and reproducible.

Analysis of Incidence and Reasons for Re-intervention After Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Trifecta Aortic Bioprosthesis.

Trifecta bioprosthesis claims favorable hemodynamic performance. However, reports of structural valve deterioration (SVD) raise concerns of its long-term durability. We assessed outcomes with the Trifecta valve over a 10-year period. All patients receiving Trifecta bioprostheses between October 2011 and October 2020 were included. Perioperative and survival characteristics were prospectively collated in an independent database. Re-intervention was recorded as a surrogate for SVD. Nine hundred and forty-four patients (mean age 72.82 years ± 8.13, 58% male) underwent aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve. At 10-years, 1.4% of patients required a redo operation, giving an overall freedom from re-intervention of 98.6%. The mean time to re-intervention was 48.87 months. Survival was 73.58% and 76.92% in patients who did not require re-intervention vs re-intervention group, respectively. In a large, single-center cohort, the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis had a 1.4% all-cause re-intervention rate at 10-years, with insignificant impact on survival.

Total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with preoperative anemia.

OBJECTIVES: Blood transfusions after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been associated to adverse outcomes, especially in anemic patients. However, little is known about the influence of the modality of revascularization. Total arterial revascularization (TAR) was shown to reduce postoperative transfusion when compared to saphenous vein-based (SV)-CABG (LIMA plus one/more SV grafts). We, therefore, aimed to investigate the impact of TAR-CABG versus SV-CABG on blood products use and perioperative outcomes in patients with preoperative anemia, normally at higher risk for postoperative transfusions. METHODS: From a cohort of 936 patients with mild preoperative anemia undergoing primary elective on-pump CABG, 166 matched pairs of patients undergoing either TAR- or SV-CABG were obtained. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin level <13 g/dl for men and <12 g/dl for women. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of red packed cells (RPC) use over the entire hospital stay. RESULTS: TAR patients showed significantly reduced RPC usage compared with SV (mean difference 0.45 units). TAR patients had a reduced intubation time (mean difference 7.6 h) and were discharged 1.24 days earlier than SV patients. Pneumonia and acute kidney injury were doubled among SV patients. Adjusted regression showed that TAR technique is a predictor of reduced RPC unit use regardless of age and EuroSCORE II (odds ratio: 0.63, p < .01). CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative anemia might benefit from TAR regardless of age or calculated operative risk. TAR-CABG was associated to reduced postoperative use of blood products and postoperative length of stay in comparison with SV-CABG in this subset of patients.

Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease have been found to have better outcomes with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) than with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but studies in which PCI is guided by measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been lacking. METHODS: In this multicenter, international, noninferiority trial, patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo CABG or FFR-guided PCI with current-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary end point was the occurrence within 1 year of a major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event, defined as death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. Noninferiority of FFR-guided PCI to CABG was prespecified as an upper boundary of less than 1.65 for the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio. Secondary end points included a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1500 patients underwent randomization at 48 centers. Patients assigned to undergo PCI received a mean (±SD) of 3.7±1.9 stents, and those assigned to undergo CABG received 3.4±1.0 distal anastomoses. The 1-year incidence of the composite primary end point was 10.6% among patients randomly assigned to undergo FFR-guided PCI and 6.9% among those assigned to undergo CABG (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.2), findings that were not consistent with noninferiority of FFR-guided PCI (P = 0.35 for noninferiority). The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 7.3% in the FFR-guided PCI group and 5.2% in the CABG group (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1). The incidences of major bleeding, arrhythmia, and acute kidney injury were higher in the CABG group than in the FFR-guided PCI group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided PCI was not found to be noninferior to CABG with respect to the incidence of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 1 year. (Funded by Medtronic and Abbott Vascular; FAME 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02100722.).

Primary Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation - Unravelling the Enigma.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the main cause of early mortality following heart transplantation despite several advances in donor preservation techniques and therapeutic strategies for PGD. With that aim of establishing the aetiopathogenesis of PGD and the preferred management strategies, the new consensus definition has paved the way for multiple contemporaneous studies to be undertaken and accurately compared. This review aims to provide a broad-based understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of PGD.

Surgical Treatment of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.

Importance: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but life-threatening mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction associated with high mortality despite prompt treatment. Surgery represents the standard of care; however, only small single-center series or national registries are usually available in literature, whereas international multicenter investigations have been poorly carried out, therefore limiting the evidence on this topic. Objectives: To assess the clinical characteristics and early outcomes for patients who received surgery for postinfarction VSR and to identify factors independently associated with mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction: an International Multicenter Cohort (CAUTION) Study is a retrospective multicenter international cohort study that includes patients who were treated surgically for mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction. The study was conducted from January 2001 to December 2019 at 26 different centers worldwide among 475 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for postinfarction VSR. Exposures: Surgical treatment of postinfarction VSR, independent of the technique, alone or combined with other procedures (eg, coronary artery bypass grafting). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was early mortality; secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Results: Of the 475 patients included in the study, 290 (61.1%) were men, with a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (10.1) years. Cardiogenic shock was present in 213 patients (44.8%). Emergent or salvage surgery was performed in 212 cases (44.6%). The early mortality rate was 40.4% (192 patients), and it did not improve during the nearly 20 years considered for the study (median [IQR] yearly mortality, 41.7% [32.6%-50.0%]). Low cardiac output syndrome and multiorgan failure were the most common causes of death (low cardiac output syndrome, 70 [36.5%]; multiorgan failure, 53 [27.6%]). Recurrent VSR occurred in 59 participants (12.4%) but was not associated with mortality. Cardiogenic shock (survived: 95 [33.6%]; died, 118 [61.5%]; P < .001) and early surgery (time to surgery ≥7 days, survived: 105 [57.4%]; died, 47 [35.1%]; P < .001) were associated with lower survival. At multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P = .001), preoperative cardiac arrest (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.18-6.27; P = .02) and percutaneous revascularization (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.003-2.65; P = .048), and postoperative need for intra-aortic balloon pump (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.46-6.09; P = .003) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.30-7.38; P = .01) were independently associated with mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, surgical repair of postinfarction VSR was associated with a high risk of early mortality; this risk has remained unchanged during the last 2 decades. Delayed surgery seemed associated with better survival. Age, preoperative cardiac arrest and percutaneous revascularization, and postoperative need for intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were independently associated with early mortality. Further prospective studies addressing preoperative and perioperative patient management are warranted to hopefully improve the currently suboptimal outcome.

Heart transplantation in the UK during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate practice and understand the impact of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on heart transplantation in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective review of the UK Transplant Registry (UKTR) and a national survey of UK heart transplant centers have been performed. The early pandemic period is defined here as 1 March to 31 May 2020. RESULTS: There was geographic variation in the prevalence of COVID-19 across the UK. All centers reported adaptations to maintain the safety of their staff, candidate, and recipient populations. The number of donors fell by 31% during the early pandemic period. Heart utilization increased to 35%, compared to 26% during the same period of 2019. The number of heart transplants was well maintained, across all centers, with 38 performed, compared to 41 during the same period of 2019, with no change in 30-day survival. Twenty-seven heart transplant recipients with confirmed COVID-19 infection were reported during the study period. CONCLUSION: All UK heart transplant centers have successfully adapted their programs to overcome the challenges of staff redeployment and ICU and hospital resource limitation, associated with the pandemic, whilst continuing heart transplant activity. On-going evaluation of practice changes, with sharing of lessons learned, is required as the pandemic continues.

Current options and recommendations for the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease: an expert consensus document of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC) Working Group of Cardiovascular Surgery, the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

Since its clinical implementation in the late nineties, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the standard treatment of several acute and chronic diseases of the thoracic aorta. While TEVAR has been embraced by many, this disruptive technology has also stimulated the continuing evolution of open surgery, which became even more important as late TEVAR failures do need open surgical correction justifying the need to unite both treatment options under one umbrella. This fact shows the importance of-in analogy to the heart team-aortic centre formation and centralization of care, which stimulates continuing development and improves outcome . The next frontier to be explored is the most proximal component of the aorta-the aortic root, in particular in acute type A aortic dissection-which remains the main challenge for the years to come. The aim of this document is to provide the reader with a synopsis of current evidence regarding the use or non-use of TEVAR in acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease, to share latest recommendations for a modified terminology and for reporting standards and finally to provide a glimpse into future developments.

The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and COVID-19 on lung transplantation in the UK: Lessons learned from the first wave.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is particularly susceptible to the impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, and evaluation of changes to practice is required to inform future decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective review of the UK Transplant Registry (UKTR) and national survey of UK lung transplant centers has been performed. RESULTS: There was geographic variation in the prevalence of COVID-19 infection across the UK. The number of donors fell by 48% during the early pandemic period. Lung utilization fell to 10% (compared with 24% for the same period of 2019). The number of lung transplants performed fell by 77% from 53, March to May 2019, to 12. Seven (58%) of these were performed in a single-center, designated "COVID-light." The number of patients who died on the lung transplant waiting list increased, compared to the same period of 2019 (p = .0118). Twenty-six lung transplant recipients with confirmed COVID-19 infection were reported during the study period. CONCLUSION: As the pandemic continues, reviewing practice and implementing the lessons learned during this period, including the use of robust donor testing strategies and the provision of "COVID-light" hospitals, are vital in ensuring the safe continuation of our lung transplant program.

The introduction of a super-urgent heart allocation scheme in the UK: A 2-year review.

BACKGROUND: In response to a growing number of patients on the UK urgent heart transplant waiting list, the UK donor heart allocation scheme was revised in October 2016 with the introduction of a new super-urgent category. Patients with temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) became eligible for super-urgent registration. The aim of this study was to compare activity, indications, and outcomes before and after the change. METHODS: Data on adult (aged ≥16 years) heart transplant registrations and recipients in the 2 years before (Era 1: July 1, 2014-June 30, 2016) and after (Era 2: January 2017-December 2018) the introduction of the new scheme were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry and analyzed using competing risks analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: There were 525 waiting-list registrations in Era 1 and 594 in Era 2, including 14% super-urgent registrations, with 90% having some form of tMCS. Median waiting time to transplant was 41 days for all urgent registrations in Era 1 compared with 17 days for super-urgent registrations and 71 days for urgent registrations in Era 2. Numbers of non-urgent transplants were not affected. Deaths on the waiting list significantly decreased from 5% to 2% at 6 months between Era 1 and Era 2 (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13-0.62). In addition, total number of patients with tMCS were not different between both eras, suggesting no significant change in this area of clinical decision making. Post-transplant survival at 1 year for super-urgent recipients was not significantly different from post-transplant survival at 1 year for other categories. CONCLUSIONS: The Introduction of a super-urgent heart allocation scheme in the UK reduces waiting time to transplant for the sickest patients, with comparable post-transplant survival while reducing deaths on the waiting list.

Prioritising transplantation for adult congenital heart disease, UK national data.

OBJECTIVE: There are no multi-centre data on the outcomes of transplant for adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) outside of North America. The literature has identified a number of concerns for this population such as increased wait-list and early post-operative mortality. We investigated outcomes in a national cohort to see if these problems are replicated outside of America. METHODS: Adults (aged ≥16 years) undergoing primary heart transplantation 1995-2014 were identified in the UK Registry and registration, operative and post-transplantation related clinical factors were compared to non ACHD recipients. RESULTS: Of 3026 adults who underwent primary heart transplantation, 134 (4.4%) had ACHD (median age 30 years; 40.3% female). For the ACHD patients listed as urgent status, the time to transplant was not significantly different to non ACHD patients and ACHD were not more likely to die or be removed from the wait list. Despite ACHD recipients having longer hospital stays (27 vs. 22 days; p = 0.003) and worse 90-day survival (79.5% vs. 86.6%; p = 0.02), long-term post-transplantation survival was not significantly different. Creatinine clearance was significantly better in ACHD patients at follow-up. In the last 10 years of our study period, all single ventricle transplants have been restricted to experienced ACHD teams, one year survival for Fontan patients was 89.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of urgent listing appears to have benefited the ACHD group by allowing equal access to transplantation, and recent concentration of expertise for single ventricle transplants has been associated with excellent early survival.